Useful answers.
Visible sources.

Our standard is simple: explain what we know, show where it comes from, and make uncertainty clear.

Sources and verification

We prioritise developer announcements, publisher documentation and official store listings. Each article has a source list. If sources conflict, we prefer the most relevant current statement and explain material limitations.

A guide's version label describes the update it covers. Its checked date records our source review, not a promise that a live game has stopped changing. Publication dates are not refreshed automatically.

Facts, guidance and hands-on testing

Officially documented facts and our suggested approaches are labelled distinctly. We do not claim to have played, benchmarked or tested a game unless that work has actually been done. Source-based guides are not hands-on reviews.

Software, including AI tools, may assist research organisation, drafting and implementation. Published claims must still be tied to identifiable evidence. We do not invent quotes, player statistics, test results or developer statements.

Updates and corrections

When a factual correction or game update changes an answer, we revise the affected passage and checked date. Significant corrections receive a note explaining what changed. Outdated information is not silently repackaged as new coverage.

Advertising and commercial relationships

Ad placements are labelled “Advertisement.” Sponsored content and affiliate links, if introduced, will be disclosed at the point of use. Payment does not buy a favourable conclusion or change a documented game fact.

Images and originality

Articles are written for GGFeed. We use attributed game imagery to illustrate the games being discussed and retain source records. Design mockups and generated concept images are never described as authentic gameplay.